Entries categorized as ‘Educational communication’

How can we improve the quality of instructional materials?

January 28, 2008 · 37 Comments

The recent posts on “Devcompage’s new look” and “How readable are food recipes?” elicited scintillating comments from readers. A reader’s comment on the usefulness of running readability tests on VSU’s instructional materials was followed by an account of a devcom alumnus about his experiences in our classrooms. The chain of comments is worth reading as it brings to the fore some key issues about instruction — the readability of instructional materials, page design elements that contribute to reading ease, the need to ensure accuracy in textbook content, relevance or timeliness of content, etc. Equally important in classroom learning is the “feel good” factor which can be the sum of all these parts.

Interesting comments have continued to be posted or sent to me by email to build on the earlier comments in “Devcompage’s new look” which deserve attention. I’d like to invite the readers to post their comments on what they have done or what can be done to improve the quality of instructional materials.

Best practices

Through your comments, I hope we can pull together a compilation of “best practices” in developing instructional materials (IMs) and distill what works best in the classroom, training center or field. Results will be synthesized and presented in this blog. We can then share the results with university administrators, teachers, parents, students, future teachers, and others who care about the quality of instruction. Here are tentative guide questions. Tackle any of these in which you have an unforgettable experience or that which you are passionate about.

Students/alumni

  • From what type of instructional materials do you learn the most?
  • From which medium or media mix do you retain information more - paper handouts or PowerPoint presentations, a website? Why?
  • In this age of competing new media (cell phones, email, weblogs, podcasts, videocasts, etc.) how can those be tapped for instruction?
  • What has been your best classroom experience?
  • What classroom activities made you learn more?
  • What were the qualities of the teachers who engaged your attention and participation?

Teachers/trainers/resource persons

  • What sort of instructional materials do you give your students? Are these free or paid for?
  • How did you design your instructional materials to ensure that they are read by your training participants or students?
  • How do you make training or classroom instruction a worthwhile experience?
  • If your university is resource-handicapped, how did you circumvent that to “satisfice” and manage to improve the quality of instruction?
  • If you are not using information and communication technology or online resources in your classroom instruction, why not? What are the constraints in using a website or a weblog for instruction?

Extension specialists

  • What types of extension materials do you use to reach your intended beneficiaries?
  • Have you tried using ICTs to reach, motivate and teach farmers?
  • What are your experiences in the use of cell phones to provide agricultural advice to farmers?
  • What has been farmers’ response to ICTs?
  • What is the current state of ICT access among farmers in your area?
  • What are your difficulties when it comes to preparing instructional materials for extension?

Your comments will help enlighten everyone who is concerned about teaching and learning. Please post your comments.

Categories: Educational communication
Tagged: , ,

Devcompage’s new look

January 21, 2008 · 10 Comments

Our recent post on “How readable are food recipes” got the most views from readers over several days and still counting. I had not expected such interest in a popular application of readability measures. Before the weekend, a social science colleague told me that reading Devcompage informed him about the existence of readability tests and that perhaps the instructional materials of the university should be assessed for reading ease.

That got me to rethink the readability of Devcompage. Apart from the number of words, number of sentences and polysyllables, using larger font sizes, san serif fonts, and having a lot of white space contribute to the readability of a page design. This we learned in undergrad journalism courses. Experts says that larger font sizes, san serif fonts (like Arial Century Gothic, Verdana, etc.) and having a lot of white space contribute to readability. Sans-serifs are fonts that don’t have serifs. They look more modern and are more readable than serifs because they are simpler.

Once I approached the late Gerry Gil, a wordsmith, who had a Ph.D. from Stanford University, to ask which was more readable — Times Roman or Arial. Gerry said that while the rule says san serif fonts are easier to read, it really is a matter of familiarity.

The new theme of Devcompage is an attempt to enhance its readability. Let me know your comments.

Categories: Educational communication
Tagged: , , ,

A new domain name

December 30, 2007 · 14 Comments

Happy New Year! What better way to welcome the new year than with a new look — a new WordPress theme and a new domain name that will make visiting our blog a lot easier. Please spread the word to your friends, classmates, students, and colleagues. From now on, just type: http://devcompage.com.

A few readers wrote that they are unable to download the readings in PDF format because they have no Adobe Acrobat Reader in their computer. You can download the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe website.

May all your wishes for the new year come true.

Categories: Educational communication
Tagged: ,